by Javier Laspiur.
This is importantThis is really fucking important.
They’re holding the n64 so wrong and why on earth did they buy a vita smh
If you can think of a ship, i will answer these questions for them
who cooks normally?:
how often do they fight?:
what do they do when they’re away from each other?:
nicknames for each other?:
who is more likely to pay for dinner?:
who steals the covers at night?:
what would they get each other for gifts?:
who remembers things?:
who cusses more?:
what would they do if the other one was hurt?:
who kissed who first?:
who made the first move?:
who started the relationship?:
With the noses knocked off AGAIN.
These mf’s scoured the world trying to destroy our statues and wash away our history. Too bad they’ll always come up short.
White people really did/will do any and everything in their power to not acknowledge that we are the natural born rulers of the world. They’ll never amount. Sorry, not sorry.
Whilst these archaeological finds are truly amazing, what’s really amazing are the retarded comments about the noses & the conspiracy sounding claims that white people go about discovering ancient ruins then set about about defacing them & then sneak off waiting for people to discover them. Like a troll playing the long game.
These claims are so fucked up. If you look very closely at the last picture only one of the statues has some kind of nasal damage & I’ll wager that damage was caused by it falling over at some point & not as the above commentators would like to think by the KKK’s top secret ‘Alter History The Really Hard Way Division’.
Muslims defaced them when they invaded Egypt all those centuries ago.
that is the most relevant thing Rita Ora has done with her career
1. This would be considered sexual harassment/assault
2. The way they’re acting makes it look like this wasn’t planned at all
3. Gender roles are weird
4. Zac Efron has an amazing bod
He did the only thing he could do….he rolled with it.
Can we please stop passing sexual harassment off as cute and funny when it’s happening to a guy?
He did the only thing he could do….he rolled with it.
samaelcarver, I wonder if you would still be saying that if the roles were reversed: Rita Ora’s giving a speech, and then Zac Efron just comes out of nowhere and rips her dress off.
I don’t know about Zac, but if this shit happened to me, I would certainly not “roll with it”. I would tell her that 1) what she did was wrong and 2) I refuse to be sexually harassed by anyone, just because the world thinks it’s funny/cute when it happens to guys.
Sam was basically saying that due to the circumstances of these double standards, Zac did the only thing he could think to do, he rolled with it. Sam was definitely not saying this was okay.
Exactly. What else was he supposed to do? If he did anything other than “roll” with it we would still be talking about how he overreacted, couldn’t take a joke, or worse (depending on what he did).
bitch ever does that to me she’s going to the OR
I don’t like how it is acceptable to basically disrobe a guy, or at least just take off his shirt. And if there is a part going on and all the guys are taking off their shirts for one reason or another, they place a lot of pressure on other guys to do the same, while girls are exempt.
- Mod Helga
On Britain’s Got Talent a bloke was badgered to take off his shirt even though he didn’t want to. If it was a girl, everyone would be in uproar but the poor guy wasn’t defended by anyone. Another contestant actually tried to rip his shirt off him after he stated calmly, many times, that he didn’t want to take his shirt off. And when people sent in questions for the acts, guess what he got asked. “Can you take your shirt off again?”
And a non sexual example of double standards, a show made by the same channel, This Morning, is hosted by pairs, a man and woman. One of the pairs is a married couple called Ruth and Eammon. Ruth often makes jabs at Eammon during the show and it’s never called out. The other day she was mocking him for wearing a brightly coloured shirt when they were on holiday and they talked about how she would refuse to go anywhere with him if he wore a bright coloured shirt. No one defended Eammon but I get the feeling that if he mocked Ruth’s clothes or told her he wasn’t going out with her unless she changed, he’d be branded a sexist pig.
There. That thing with the got talent thing. That is what I was talking about earlier when I answered that one ask.
- Mod Helga
Friendly reminder that social justice is a vicious cancer on basic humanity.
REBLOG this to prove you are not a Muggle.
my reblog button fucked up and i almost had a heart attack
I did it in the first try.
OH MY GOD.
MY COMPUTER BROWSER FROZE AND I DIDN’T REALIZE IT. I COULDN’T BREATHE.
But the lack of notes truly worries me
First of all, no.
You gonna explain why? If not, go be 14 somewhere else.
You are either male or female. You can’t be anything else.
Gender is a man made construct. Same is morality and virginity. You don’t find it anywhere else in the animal kingdom because it doesn’t actually exist. Humans created man and woman and the gender roles that go along with them. Human created the concepts of masculinity and femininity, and when people don’t fit perfectly into these boxes, human are allowed to create other gender to better suit them. Gender isn’t set in stone because gender has been fabricated.
“You don’t find it anywhere else in the animal kingdom because it doesn’t actually exist.”
Ah, so you find this to somehow be a valuable argument good for you. Except you’re wrong.
Gender roles do exist in the animal kingdom. Female and males of each species have very specific roles, and very, very rarely they ever act out of it. While saying that animals have developed concepts of masculinity and femininity wouldn’t be entirely right, it also wouldn’t be entirely wrong. In each species, there are favorable traits in both males and females that determine who gets to breed and pass his line. Lions for example determine who is the better lion to breed with females by having darker manes and stronger roars. You could compare that to masculinity.
When animals fail to meet the expectations in their respective environments, they’re excluded by all other animals if they act collectively, if they’re loners they simply survive for shorter periods of time. No animals decided to become a third gender or claim kinship with other species. They’re either excluded or die alone.
So you see, gender is indeed created by humanity, much like everything else humanity has done, but it’s based on biological realities much like the ones we share with other species.
“B-but is a social construct!" is not an argument and you’re not entitled to us caring about you when we exclude you for being a goddamn idiot.
Evolutionary physical factors that help breeding process are not the same as masculinity. Gender does not exist in animals, SEX exists in animals. The expectations animals fail to meet are things like, being able to hunt, being lame, not being able to contribute to the group, having some other defect. Humans don’t do this. Gender is not the same as an abnormality.
Except that is wrong.
While animal favorable traits and masculinity are not the same (and I never said they are, i said they’re comparable learn to fucking read). Since humans stands in a higher evolutionary level, of course we have developed a far more complex concept of gender which animals don’t have, the point is our social construction of gender stems from natural biological traits we share with animals, the same applies to what is seem desirable in each gender and their roles in society.
The traits animals find favorable are not limited to skills but also looks that are find desirable, thing that are deemed to be better genes, the better of its species much like in masculinity the more masculine man is deemed to be the better of the bunch, the same goes with femininity. Animals are rejected by possible partners by looks alone, the’re excluded, and they die together with their blood line.
Who says the same doesn’t apply to humans? Haven’t people that fail to meet the expectations of masculinity and femininity (queers) as well as their roles been historically excluded by society in all majors civilizations? Why should that change now? For your comfort? For you to feel good about yourself? Non-binary gender surely is an abnormality, considering that normal is a synonym of common and abnormal being the complete opposite of normal, non-binary people are an abnormality, they are uncommon and there’s nothing desirable about them from a civilizational point of view.
There’s nothing that justifies your existence nor validates your identity other than your feels alone. And as a society that constructs its concepts and norms we’re more than in liberty to exclude you.
woah are you kidding me right now? Are you literally telling me that my existence is irrelevant because i don’t fit into a neat little box of masculine or feminine?
lets ignore the fact that i too am human and focus on the fact that i’m queer and therefore abnormal???
really? have we not evolved far enough for you to realize how ridiculous you’re being?
because i’d hoped that since humans HAVE evolved to understand that there is no difference between a person based on genitals and that there are more types of people than masculine and feminine. We are not a part of the wild animal kingdom anymore. we have evolved and developed empathy, or at least clearly only some have.
MOST people have evolved to CARE about others. i am not masculine, i am not feminine, so what? should i be discarded into the woods until my blood line dies out?
you need to grow up.
Am I not using anything else but your logic, though?
Here you are telling me gender is socially constructed, that virginity is socially constructed, but most importantly that morality is socially constructed.
Indeed if morality is socially constructed, then no moral is absolute. There is no absolute principle that tells me killing is wrong, that discriminating is wrong, that hitting someone is wrong, that excluding you is wrong. Have we as a society accepted that there should not be discrimination based on sex because it is wrong? Yes we have. So what? It was a social construction, nothing makes it absolute. We can revert it any time as the socially constructing society that we are.
So pretty much, of course we can exclude you based on our social constructions. Do you think that being born into the same species than us validates your identity and justifies your existence? Being human justifies nothing. Do we not exclude pedophiles and murderers too? Are they not human too? Why should we not exclude them? We exclude them because we see them as undesirables. Being the abnormality that you are (and yes you are considering non-binary people are an extremely irrelevant minority) why should you be desirable?
Your existence is not justified. You yourself just pretty much made crystal clear that no moral is absolute. Nothing bout our social constructs is what is keeping you alive right now. That’s our social construct, so is gender, and our social construct is binary. Do please “destroy” our social constructs and see the sanctity of your life fade away.
Thanks for your over emotional response.
please, forgive me for having an emotional reaction to being told my existence is irrelevant. I forget that as an abnormal being i shouldn’t fucking care.
you are not understand ANYTHING. Yes, morals are something ONLY found in humans, but i NEVER said that morals are a bad thing and should be destroyed???. Morals are what separated from animals. We have empathy, we (should, clearly u don’t) care about other human beings, and when someone lacks empathy it’s a problem because it puts other humans in danger, when goes back to morality. we shouldn’t want to hurt or discard each other. morals are not found naturally in animals, neither is gender. but these aren’t bad things and no one said that, you are being purposefully hurtful. YOU’RE the abnormality here. not for your gende but because you’re simply a piece of shit.
there are more than two genders. morality is debatable. don’t fucking be an asshole.
Nah nah, my dear abnormality. You don’t get to cherry pick our social constructs. As a minority you either take them all or take none. This is not a supermarket where you go "hmmm no this Human Inc. gender flavored social construct sucks. I hate it. Oh but I love this morality flavored social construct! It fits all my needs! Human Inc. you so cool now but you still gotta ditch the other flavor!”
Ultimately it is for us, the majority, to decide what goes or what doesn’t in our social constructs. Now, you can express yourself however you want. Go ahead, dress however you want, fuck whoever you want, etc, but don’t come here making up genders and calling yourself oppressed and us oppressors. You’re either a male/man or a female/woman, however you express yourself doesn’t change this and we honestly couldn’t care less if you don’t identify with either.
There’re only as many genders as we decide there to be and that’s two. You as a minority are so utterly insignificant it won’t make a change.
What I find hilarious though is that you’re still here telling me morality debatable when by making it such is how I just justified someone erasing your existence for the betterment of society.
I suggest you stick to your studying, get yourself a job and grow up out of this phase eventually. Then cry yourself to sleep.
Heads up guys. Body shaming doesn’t just happen to women. Recently, baseball player Prince Fielder stripped down for ESPN’s Body issue and here are the comments that accompanied. Now, I will acknowledge that these are all male contributes, but it’s still shining a light on fat shaming for men, and how athletes (and anyone who poses nude) are socially expected to be perfect.
I’m not going to downplay the amount of shit women get on their bodies, but I would like to point out that this made news today.He looks great people shaming him forget he’s a ducking baseball player his build is going to be a bit different than say a gymnast.
Of course it’s mostly men - it’s mostly women who shame other women. When you get down to it, the gender you’re trying to attract isn’t going to care. It’s the competition that wants to bring you down.
i don’t reblog shit like this but this is so good
If I’m reading this right 100+ thousand women want to go someplace specifically because they want to humiliate the servers and to shame their coworkers.
Nobody will reblog this because it’s tumblr and women get a free pass on being absolutely shitty terrible human beings here but I want you to think for a moment about a hundred thousand men on this site flat out confessing:
"You know what I really want? I want to go some place tonight and I want to publicly humiliate a woman and sexually harass her. Maybe I’ll go on my lunch break tomorrow and talk about how I sexually harassed and victimized her to my female colleagues just so they’ll feel the same sense of shame and embarassment."
You would rightly think them a cruel inhuman monster. There woukd be shrieks of feminist rage. People would be holding it up as proof of “why we need feminism”… Unless you were a woman talking about doing that to a man.
Then that shit is straight ROFLCOPTR and all of tumblr laughs with you.
Christ… so many shit human beings in one place. What are we even doing here?